Every year the American Veterinary
Medical Foundation, the charitable arm of the AVMA, hosts the America’s Favorite
Veterinarian contest. Its objective is to “honor and recognize those entrusted
to preserve and protect the health and well-being of pets, as well as to
celebrate the special relationship pet owners share with their veterinarians.” Seems
like a laudable and harmless event, right?
A group of animal rights activists opposed to declawing cats
disagreed, and it launched vicious cyberattacks against most of this year’s 20
finalists. Their actions brought the contest to a halt before a winner could be
declared.
The activists phoned the animal hospitals where the finalists
worked and, posing as potential clients, asked about declawing. If those hospitals
performed declaws, the activists subjected them to fraudulent negative
advertisements on Facebook, damaging negative online reviews, and threatening phone calls.
One contestant was called “a whore, a butcher, a mutilator, a hack, an animal
hater, a disgrace to the profession.”
Most of the practices contacted did offer the surgery as a
last resort if their clients had tried everything else to prevent destructive
clawing behavior, or if being scratched presented a health risk for the cat
owner. That is the stand we also take. We discuss
alternatives with our clients. If they decide they must
have their cat declawed, and if it’s an indoor cat, we’ll perform the procedure
if the case fulfills the criteria we have established in our practice.
My experience has been that cat owners who make the decision
to declaw don’t take it lightly. They’re concerned about whether their kitty
will be in pain after the surgery, and about how he’ll
function without front claws. Because we use both general and local anesthesia,
a CO2 laser, pre-
and post-op pain medications, and take-home analgesics, our patients experience
very little pain and discomfort. They also function very well with no front
claws. I can’t recall any long-term complications in cats we’ve declawed, and
our clients are pleased with the results.
Many of our clients disagree with declawing and choose not to
remove their cat’s claws. I support that decision; I prefer not to declaw. But I
always urge cat owners to think ahead: What
if they buy an expensive sofa, for example, and their cat destroys it? Will
they accept that willingly, or will they then decide to declaw? Young cats
recover quickly from the surgery, but it can be much harder, both physically
and mentally, for older cats. Because of that, we prefer not to declaw adult
cats. So it’s imperative that owners carefully consider the pros and cons of living
with a fully armed cat before making a decision.
I understand the passion of animal rights activists. In fact,
I’ve eaten a completely plant-based diet for almost five years, not only for
health reasons but also because I feel that big agriculture is inhumane to our
animal friends. It may seem like my
views – about preventing animal cruelty by not eating animal products, but
allowing cat declaws – are at odds with each other. But exceptions are the
rule. Some populations need to eat animal products in order to survive; I fully
accept that. And sometimes we have to
declaw a cat to allow him to share a loving home with humans.
Pet owners have to make many life-changing choices for their
pets, and most do so with good intentions. We can’t allow bullies to interfere
with decisions that should be made between a client and a doctor.
No comments:
Post a Comment